Sugar Shane

Joined

• started 27 topics
• posted 177 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Sugar Shane

• 
  4

  Any updates on the Lopez Case?

  by Sugar Shane in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  if i'm not mistaken, this week the court in san diego was going to render a decision on the wts wish to continue oral arguements, or something along those lines.

  someone may have brought this up already.

  if so, then my apologies.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sugar Shane

  If I'm not mistaken, this week the court in San Diego was going to render a decision on the WTS wish to continue oral arguements, or something along those lines. Someone may have brought this up already. If so, then my apologies.
• 
  32

  Re: Quarterly Organizational Accomplishments Video Series

  by pixel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  dear brothers:.

  we are pleased to inform you that a new series of short videos will be produced to emphasize the acceleration of the worldwide work of jehovah’s witnesses.

  (isa.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sugar Shane

  Good. Sooner the better.

  BTW, I doubt they're going to show, in any amount of detail, where the donations are going.

  I just happened across this from the Methodist website, and I'm sure other 'mainstream' denominations & secular non-profits have the same info readily available to the public: http://www.umcor.org/UMCOR/About-Us/Financials

  I have yet to see anything REMOTELY like this from the Watchtower. I'd like to shove reports like the one above in the faces of some of the more arrogant elder types, and ask em,' "can you please show me the money?"
• 
  32

  Re: Quarterly Organizational Accomplishments Video Series

  by pixel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  dear brothers:.

  we are pleased to inform you that a new series of short videos will be produced to emphasize the acceleration of the worldwide work of jehovah’s witnesses.

  (isa.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sugar Shane

  Will someone leak these videos soon?

  I'm curious to see if they offer any specifics, such as a table or graph with expenditures per country, along with $xxxx on construction, $xxxx on publications, ect. To be truthful, they would need to show $xxxx going to the lawsuit defense fund--perhaps that would be classified as "other expenses." LoL.

  I'm thinking it will be a glossed-over propaganda film, like the kinds we've seen throughout history, from nations on the losing end of a war. "The Reich shall be Victorious!"
• 
  161

  Court denies summary judgement for Laurel Jehovah's Witnesses congregation

  by OrphanCrow in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  court denies summary judgement for laurel jehovah's witnesses congregation.

  a motion for summary judgement is denied in a case against the laurel congregation of jehovah's witnesses and some individuals over child abuse reporting issues.a lawyer for the congregation maintained that elders were exempted from reporting requirements under a state law because of clergy privilege and confidentiality.the case resulted from allegations that elders did not report an unlawful sexual relationship between a woman and a 14-year-old boy, both of whom were members of the jehovah's witnesses congregation.. download the court opinion here.

  http://courts.delaware.gov/opinions/download.aspx?id=235880.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sugar Shane

  That guarantee means immunity for the sinner when he confesses a crime to the church and immunity for the church for not reporting the crime.

  Yes Fisherman, as long as ABSOLUTE CONFIDENCE is assured. Why are you not able to comprehend this?

  Supreme Court Justice Burger (former): “The clergy privilege is rooted in the imperative need for confidence and trust. The... privilege recognizes the human need to disclose to a spiritual counselor, in total and absolute confidence, what are believed to be flawed acts or thoughts and to receive consolations and guidance in return.”
  

  
  
• 
  161

  Court denies summary judgement for Laurel Jehovah's Witnesses congregation

  by OrphanCrow in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  court denies summary judgement for laurel jehovah's witnesses congregation.

  a motion for summary judgement is denied in a case against the laurel congregation of jehovah's witnesses and some individuals over child abuse reporting issues.a lawyer for the congregation maintained that elders were exempted from reporting requirements under a state law because of clergy privilege and confidentiality.the case resulted from allegations that elders did not report an unlawful sexual relationship between a woman and a 14-year-old boy, both of whom were members of the jehovah's witnesses congregation.. download the court opinion here.

  http://courts.delaware.gov/opinions/download.aspx?id=235880.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sugar Shane

  But, Fisherman said that it's confidential if it's simply NOT reported to the secular authorities. I believe he researched this definition from the "pulled it out of my ass" law dictionary. Or, perhaps it's based on his extensive background in....umm...err. Nevermind. I guess I'm with Grundy (and just about everyone else) on this.
• 
  161

  Court denies summary judgement for Laurel Jehovah's Witnesses congregation

  by OrphanCrow in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  court denies summary judgement for laurel jehovah's witnesses congregation.

  a motion for summary judgement is denied in a case against the laurel congregation of jehovah's witnesses and some individuals over child abuse reporting issues.a lawyer for the congregation maintained that elders were exempted from reporting requirements under a state law because of clergy privilege and confidentiality.the case resulted from allegations that elders did not report an unlawful sexual relationship between a woman and a 14-year-old boy, both of whom were members of the jehovah's witnesses congregation.. download the court opinion here.

  http://courts.delaware.gov/opinions/download.aspx?id=235880.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sugar Shane

  No it doesn't. It only applies to Delaware law.

  For the time being, perhaps. But, thanks to legal precedent, this will likely apply to similar decisions in other states.

  One cannot also rule out the effects of the ARC, and the ongoing UK Charities Commission, on future legal interpretation in the US and Canada. It's all Common Law.
• 
  161

  Court denies summary judgement for Laurel Jehovah's Witnesses congregation

  by OrphanCrow in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  court denies summary judgement for laurel jehovah's witnesses congregation.

  a motion for summary judgement is denied in a case against the laurel congregation of jehovah's witnesses and some individuals over child abuse reporting issues.a lawyer for the congregation maintained that elders were exempted from reporting requirements under a state law because of clergy privilege and confidentiality.the case resulted from allegations that elders did not report an unlawful sexual relationship between a woman and a 14-year-old boy, both of whom were members of the jehovah's witnesses congregation.. download the court opinion here.

  http://courts.delaware.gov/opinions/download.aspx?id=235880.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sugar Shane

  Here's the media report on this. The comments at the end of the article are slowly popping up, with the last few defending, or trying to defend, the WTs position. Perhaps these are coming from the WT TROLLS someone mentioned in another thread, after all, the grammar, punctuation, and overall coherence is satisfactory (with a couple exceptions). It's only at 8 comments right now, but perhaps that will change now that I've posted this link:

  http://delawarestatenews.net/news/judge-refuses-to-dismiss-lawsuit-against-jehovahs-witnesses/
• 
  27

  Kinda Sad Re: Cart "Witnessing"

  by Captain Schmideo2 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  slightly redacted for privacy of those involved.. so, this is "park witnessing" in oklahoma.. the parks in this community are basically walking trails and some tatty playground equipment.

  most of the time, sparsely used, and today was a very blustery day.. notice the justifying comment- "quite a few" checking out the cart.

  i am sure they were..... .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sugar Shane

  LoL...yeah, I think I see an evil face towards the bottom, near his ankle.

  Off topic, but right now this minute, there's a CNN piece on the Waco stand-off with Branch Davidians. And now that the Warwick place looks more like a compound...just makes you wonder.
• 
  27

  Kinda Sad Re: Cart "Witnessing"

  by Captain Schmideo2 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  slightly redacted for privacy of those involved.. so, this is "park witnessing" in oklahoma.. the parks in this community are basically walking trails and some tatty playground equipment.

  most of the time, sparsely used, and today was a very blustery day.. notice the justifying comment- "quite a few" checking out the cart.

  i am sure they were..... .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sugar Shane

  That is pretty sad!!

  Looks like central, or western Oklahoma. OKC and surrounding areas have plenty of parks with trails & stuff. Tulsa & eastern OK is actually kinda hilly, so I doubt the pic was taken there.

  Regardless, it looks like a nice, sunny day to: help a neighbor mend a broken fence, feed a homeless vet, mentor some disadvantaged youth, ect.

  I recall that after the OKC bombings, many churches in the area joined together with various aid agencies to offer shelter & healing. Same thing happened when the tornadoes leveled parts of town in recent years. There's always been an attitude there of "we're all in this together." It's an attitude shared by many, though I'm guessing it's probably not shared by many JWs. I say that as a non-JW, but that's the impression I get.
• 
  14

  Whatever happened to the Lopez case?

  by StarTrekAngel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  was it settled?

  is it still pending further appeal?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sugar Shane

  Was Lopez molested while in field service, or a similar activity? If so, was the congregation negligent in letting him be alone with a known pedophile? If so, then he wins the case hands down I'd think, based upon the precedent set by Conti.